The Speed of Eval in Some Lisp Implementations.

moved to kazimirmajorinc.com

9 comments:

  1. cormullion29 December 2008 at 10:03

    that's a lot of Lisp programs you have there!

    times here on an iMac are:

    622
    307
    676
    757

    ReplyDelete
  2. Arm2 February 2010 at 01:43

    Very nice, but... WTF is each numeric column?
    A table with no references is worthless.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kazimir Majorinc30 August 2010 at 13:28

    The numbers are evaluation times of four expressions, given above in Newlisp, Scheme, Common Lisp and Clojure on my PC. Other dialects might have slightly different code.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown17 September 2010 at 21:56

    ran into this post. was looking for the date the article was written...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kazimir Majorinc18 September 2010 at 00:51

    Xah, the first version is written 28 Dec 2008, but new items are added continuously; for example, Clojure 1.2 was added yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unknown19 September 2010 at 07:32

    i hate it when i couldn't find the date a article was written on the web. Did you intentionally didn't want to include that? or i missed it somewhere?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kazimir Majorinc20 September 2010 at 12:41

    Yes, I intentionally didn't included that. But I forgot why I did it, it was long time ago. Now I only assume that I have good reason. At least it is visible in address of the page:

    http://kazimirmajorinc.blogspot.com/2008/12/speed-of-newlisp-eval-test-v100.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. Unknown22 February 2011 at 05:40

    Kazimir, could you add Stalin to your set of tests? Also, please consider testing Chicken and the latest update of Racket.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kazimir Majorinc22 February 2011 at 08:31

    Mark C, I just did it for Racket and Chicken; not for Stalin because it doesn't support EVAL. Also, there are two different results for Chicken - for interpreted code, using csi, and compiled, using csc.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)